During the status quo period, a new agreement is negotiated, which generally changes the original loan repayment plan. This option is used as an alternative to bankruptcy or enforced execution if the borrower cannot repay the loan. The status quo agreement allows the lender to save some value from the loan. In the event of forced execution, the lender must receive nothing. By working with the borrower, the lender can improve its chances of repaying some of the outstanding debt. In banking, a status quo agreement between a lender and a borrower terminates the contractual repayment plan of a struggling borrower and imposes certain steps that the borrower must take. In other areas of activity, a status quo agreement can be virtually any agreement between the parties, in which both parties agree to discontinue the case for a specified period of time. This may include an agreement to defer payments to help a company in difficult market conditions, agreements to stop the production of a product, agreements between governments or many other types of agreements. A status quo agreement between a lender and a borrower may also exist when the lender stops requiring a planned interest or capital payment for a loan to give the borrower time to restructure its debts. A status quo agreement can be practically an agreement between the parties, in which both parties decide to suspend a specific issue for a specified date. This may be an agreement to defer payments to help a customer overcome strict market conditions.
It can also be agreements to stop the production of a product. A status quo agreement can be reached between a lender and a borrower. It gives the borrower time to restructure its debts. On the other hand, the lender provides for a certain moratorium on the payment of interest or principal loans. The concept of a status quo agreement refers to different forms of agreements that companies can enter into to delay actions that could be taken otherwise. A status quo agreement between a bank and a borrower operates in lines similar to those shown above. It suspends the contractual repayment plan of a stressed borrower and imposes certain conditions on the borrower. Prior to their accession to the new territories, a status quo agreement was negotiated between India and Densern and the princely states of the British Indian Empire.
It was a bilateral form of the agreement. Ordinary shareholders tend not to like status quo agreements because they limit the potential returns of a buyout. A status quo agreement is a form of anti-support measure. Status quo agreements are also used to suspend the usual limitation period to make a claim in court.  In 2019, video game distributor GameStop signed a status quo agreement with a group of investors who wanted changes in corporate governance, believing that the company had intrinsic value when the share price reflected.